51 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The primary and central theme of Childhood’s End is the tension between individualism and collectivism. This echoes the tensions of the Cold War and the conflict between American individualism and Soviet collectivism. The apparent destiny of humanity is to become a collective, unified whole, with one mind unified with an even higher species: the Overmind. In service of this end, the Overlords impose various collectivist values on humanity. Although many humans accept the loss of individual autonomy in exchange for advanced technology, global peace, and a much higher quality of life, there are several examples that suggest human nature is inherently individualist. Whether that individualism is a strength or weakness of humanity depends on one’s perspective. The Overlords, who are themselves permanently stuck as individuals while helping other species transform, view individualism as a drawback. The Freedom League and the residents of New Athens see an inherent threat to human nature in collectivism. Because the narration never clearly weighs in on whether the Overmind is the miraculous destiny of humanity or its destruction, only the reader can decide whether individual achievement or collective advancement is the highest good.
The existence of the Freedom League shows that human beings inherently resist even seemingly benevolent external force. The first section of the novel is largely concerned with the conflict between the Freedom League and the Overlord-aligned United Nations. Wainwright’s primary fear is that “humanity will have lost its initiative and become a subject race” (16) if the Overlords are allowed to continue directly influencing human political policy. Wainwright is the mainstream voice of the Freedom League and as such is more amenable to adopting the Overlords’ policies, but only if they are adopted by the free will of the people of Earth. The more extremist wing of the Freedom League seems primarily concerned with the disruption of the status quo of Earthly affairs but is less clear on their objections and desires. The extremists also demonstrate that they are willing to use force and deprive fellow humans of freedom to advance their own goals. Wainwright’s concern about the secrecy surrounding the Overlords’ motives is shared by Stormgren, regardless of his general support for Karellen and the Overlords.
When the Freedom League extremists try to coerce Stormgren to betray Karellen, he refuses. However, when the coercion is removed, Stormgren reconsiders and acts in possible opposition to Karellen. Whether Stormgren’s primary motivator is an inherent rebellion to external force or an inherent curiosity that overpowers his trust in Karellen is unclear. When he begins to formulate his plan, it is because “what he had refused to do under duress, he might yet attempt of his own free will” (49). This statement echoes Wainwright’s position. The primary objection to the Overlords is not the content of their directives, it is that humans are expected to acquiesce under duress. Even after the identity of the Overlords is revealed and they have brought lasting peace, health, and prosperity to humanity, there is resistance in the interests of individual achievement.
New Athens as a refuge for individual achievement offers an alternative to the world created by the collectivist policies of the Overlords. Even though the idea was developed in the immediate wake of the Overlords’ arrival, the island is still attractive after more than a generation of Overlord rule. The primary goal of New Athens is to nurture individual achievement as an example to the world of an alternative to the Overlords’ universal changes. George and Jean are both happy there, and the novel offers evidence that the struggle and conflict fostered on the island results in art and philosophy that improve the human experience. The island’s success, however, is destroyed with the loss of the children, suggesting that the collectivism of the Overmind has won out over human individualism.
One of Arthur C. Clarke’s most famous quotes, from Profiles of the Future, is his third law: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” (Clarke, Arthur C. Profiles of the Future. Gollancz, 1962). The line between magic and technology in Childhood’s End is regularly blurred. There are multiple references to religion, most notably the Overlords’ appearance as devils, and the reference to the Jonah story from the Bible. Humanity’s instinctual antipathy toward the Overlords is explained as a premonition—a mystical phenomenon given a scientific gloss via Einstein’s theory of relativity as it relates to time. There is also a specific interest throughout the novel in paranormal phenomena, called paraphysics in the novel. The human capacity to engage in the paranormal is the core ability that allows them to join the Overmind. Although science and faith are often placed in opposition, Childhood’s End suggests that what is treated as magical or mystical is actually science that humans simply don’t understand yet.
As the world transforms in the presence of the Overlords, one of the major developments is the dissolution of most religions. Even in that dissolution, there is still an instinctual fear when the Overlords appear, and they resemble devils. This innate terror is explained in “The Last Generation” in respect to the relativity of time. Rashaverak explains to Jan that it is a kind of premonition, or a memory of the future. The magical element of premonition is explained in part by Einstein’s relativity theory—science explaining magic. The combination of “some unknown magic of Overlord science” (74) and human curiosity grants humanity knowledge that destroys most religious faith. However, even though religion is largely defeated by science, the seeming dichotomy may be an illusion: “[T]he fall in religion had been paralleled by a decline in science” (75). Although not explicitly stated, this correlation suggests science and religion may arise from the same human tendencies—primarily the willingness of humans to believe in that which seems impossible.
Beginning with Rupert Boyce’s party and his interest in “paraphysics,” the paranormal quietly drives the transformation of mankind. Rashaverak’s presence at the party is prompted by his desire to access Boyce’s collection of paranormal texts. Later, as Rashaverak explains to George what has begun to happen to Jeff, he cites telepathy as part of the boy’s abilities. In Karellen’s final speech to humanity, he explains that “there are powers of the mind, and powers beyond the mind which your science could never have brought within its framework without shattering it entirely” (182), which again seems to place “paraphysics” or mysticism or faith in diametric opposition to science. However, Karellen says “your science,” not simply science. Like Clarke’s later quote, this suggests that sufficiently advanced science will eventually explain all magic.
The universal tragedy of parenthood is that parents must watch their most precious creations become independent, autonomous individuals. The climax of Childhood’s End is an extreme extension of that universal human experience. Multiple elements of the novel underscore the universality of the experience of parenthood. The Overlords are metaphorical parents to humanity. Eventually, the Overlords must watch humanity grow beyond the capacity of the Overlords. There are several moments when the experience of humanity losing their children is directly connected to the experience of individual parents watching their children grow up. The loss of humanity’s children as an extreme example of the experience of parenthood spotlights the conflicting interpretations of the ending.
Beginning with Stormgren’s relationship with Karellen, the dynamic between humans and the Overlords mimics that of parent and child. The Overlords’ few absolute requirements are put in place to protect humanity from their own dangerous impulses. George comments on this before Jeff is rescued or begins to change: “[M]en were like children amusing themselves in some secluded playground, protected from the fierce realties of the outer world” (150-51). Even the secrecy of the Overlords turns out to be a protective measure, just as parents will withhold certain information to protect the innocence of their children. The “outer world” is the knowledge of the Overmind, the eventual destiny of the human race, and the psychological challenge presented by space travel. The protection of the Overlords is a metaphor for the protections offered by parents, and eventually the necessity of that protection is removed by the passage of time and the development of humanity. Similarly, the symbiosis with the Overmind is the metaphorical movement to adulthood for the human species.
There are several moments when the narrative explicitly connects the expected losses of parenthood to the extreme loss experienced by humanity. The first is Rashaverak’s advice to George: “Enjoy them while you may […] they will not be yours for long” (177). As the narrative asserts, this is a universal truth of parenting. While children may feel they are under the protection of their parents for an eternity, parents feel the years speed by until the child has transformed into an adult. Although in the novel the “advice […] contained a threat and a terror it had never held before” (177), the result is analogous: The child reaches childhood’s end at the advent of adulthood, and the parent is left behind. The end of the novel can be seen as either disastrous or miraculous. The same tension exists for parents whose children reach adulthood and leave their parents behind.
Thomas More, in his 1516 work Utopia, coined both the term and the concept of a perfect world. In More’s book, he demonstrates that Utopia can’t exist, partially by definition, as the word means “no place,” but also because the seemingly perfect nation has costs that ultimately negate its benefits. Depictions of utopias are common in science fiction, primarily as a vantage point from which to discuss social and political problems, their potential solutions, and the drawbacks of those solutions. The world of “The Golden Age,” between the arrival of the Overlords and the transformation of the children, is specifically described as Utopia. The Overlords have solved the problems of war, violence, disease, and poverty. There are several chapters dedicated to describing the utopia created by the Overlords. Clearly, though, there is a cost to utopia for humanity, and throughout the narrative there are suggestions that the cost may outweigh the benefits.
The novel explicitly describes the world created by the Overlords as a utopia: “By the standards of all earlier ages, it was Utopia” (70). They have eradicated war by dictate and by eliminating national borders. Automation has solved hunger and poverty, and even the necessity to work. In “The Golden Age,” humanity has more leisure time than ever before, and because of universal education and universal income, that leisure yields art and philosophy rather than crime. Racial and gender inequalities have been erased. Nations no longer exist, so international conflict has ceased. Massive surveillance controlled by the Overlords prevents almost all crime, and the crime that does occur is immediately addressed. Although the world created by the Overlords is vastly better by many metrics than the world that preceded their arrival, there are downsides that emerge slowly. The erasure of religion, initially an apparent good, coincides with a drastic decrease in scientific progress. The same technology that shines the light of truth on history removes the impetus to explore. In the absence of struggle, entertainment flourishes, but art almost ceases to exist. A world without strife is, for many, a world of boredom. Some, like George, go to New Athens to find conflict, struggle, and challenge to inspire them.
The novel’s climax can be viewed, through the lens of utopian literature, as the ultimate cost of the utopic society provided by the Overlords. After humanity has been lulled into full submission by a generation of entertainment and education devoid of crisis or conflict, their children are ready to accept the Overmind. The result of the Overlord utopia is the loss of humanity’s future. One possible interpretation of the novel is that the cost of utopia is the literal end of the world.
Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Arthur C. Clarke